The Future Coin

Bitcoin

$34,877.39

BTC -11.30%

Ethereum

$1,113.33

ETH -7.73%

XRP

$0.27

XRP -7.25%

Litecoin

$137.22

LTC -9.72%

EOS

$2.68

EOS -5.10%

  • News
    • Bitcoin News
    • Ethereum News
    • Ripple News
    • Litecoin News
    • Altcoin News
    • Blockchain News
    • Business News
    • Technology News
    • Policy & Regulations
  • Markets
    • Market News
    • Market Analysis
    • Price Indexes
    • Top Cryptocurrencies
    • Heatmap
  • Opinion
  • Cryptopedia
    • Explained
    • Bitcoin101
    • Ethereum101
    • Bitcoin Cash101
    • ICO101
    • Ripple101
  • Press Releases
No Result
View All Result
The Future Coin
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology News

Former Chair Of CFTC Timothy Massad Discusses Facebook Libra In New Brookings Report

by The Future Coin
June 25, 2020
in Technology News
0
Former Chair Of CFTC Timothy Massad Discusses Facebook Libra In New Brookings Report
152
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a new report published by Brookings yesterday, the Honorable Timothy G. Massad, Senior Fellow at The John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Former Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Former Assistant Secretary, Treasury for Financial Stability, discusses changes to Facebook’s Libra. In what Massad describes as ‘Libra 2.0’, he evaluates the potential impact of Libra on both payments and financial inclusion. Massad then describes the way Chinese mobile payments have achieved both inclusion and satisfied regulatory requirements, and cautions that a U.S. central bank digital currency should be studied by the Federal Reserve but with caution, as it may disintermediate commercial banks.

Overall, the paper is sufficiently complex to manage the complicated topics at hand and at the same time, commands a simplicity and common sense to take the reader on a journey of how payments systems could still provide access to help the unbanked. Massad offers his conclusions up front: he considers ‘Libra 2.0’ as amended by the version of its white paper as one that the United States should consider embracing. Whether through Congress, the Financial Stability Oversight Board (FSOC), or through the work of regulators to stitch together a framework, Massad believes Libra 2.0 has revised its structure as such that it should be given the opportunity to help the unbanked.

President Obama To Nominate Tim Massad As CFTC Chairman in 2013

Timothy “Tim” Massad, assistant secretary of financial stability at the U.S. Treasury and U.S. … [+] President Barack Obama’s nominee as chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg *** Local Caption *** Tim Massad

BLOOMBERG NEWS

As first impressions are everything, Massad walks the reader through how Facebook itself drew renewed criticism against the Big Tech social media giant and prejudiced many lawmakers from giving Libra the time of day. Massad notes how Facebook’s Libra has changed its approach from a ‘global currency’ to matching one-to-one with sovereign currencies. The second change is enhanced compliance procedures to address concerns that the network could be used for money laundering and financing illicit activity, and the third is how the reserves will be protected for the sovereign currencies that Libra coins are issued against. Finally, Massad notes how Libra decided to jettison the idea of moving from a permissioned blockchain to a permissionless blockchain enviornment similar to Bitcoin or Ethereum, which he sees as a move in the right direction for Libra to meet its regulatory responsibilities on an ongoing basis. While fans of cryptocurrencies may find this a disappointing turn of events, it is helpful to view Libra now as more of a ‘PayPal
PYPL
’ with distributed ledger systems on new payment rails, rather than a new crypto or token on a blockchain.

Massad shares the concerns about use of data and privacy by a company such as Facebook, and the power of large digital platforms generally, and that we need to address those issues anyway, whether or not Libra goes forward. According to Massad, the goal of helping the unbanked and improving access is an important one, and we should let Libra try to make a difference.   

Massad then notes how digital currencies for his definition include everything that is tokenized, whether private money or central bank money. He argues that due to the fractional reserve banking system in the U.S., most of what commercial banks offer and create for its customers is essentially private money anyway. He then notes that for China, the advances in mobile payments demonstrated how to create a new payment rail and provide financial inclusion without creating a digital currency. While the Bank of International Settlements notes that central banks are looking to implement its own public digital currency which cover 25% of the world’s population. Massad points out that China by itself covers 20% of the population and is arguably farthest along in the development of its digital currency, which is why he takes us on a journey into China to best understand how the unbanked were provided options.

Facebook and Libra digital currency

ANKARA, TURKEY – FEBRUARY 27: In this photo illustration a smart phone displays the logo of … [+] Facebook’s thumbs up and a computer screen displays Libra logos in Ankara Turkey on February 27, 2020. Ali Balikci / Anadolu Agency

Anadolu Agency

Finally, Massad comments on both the retail CBDC suggestion in Congress as well as the idea of FedAccounts, including the notion of using the Post Office system as part of the Federal Reserve to help offer direct banking services. Massad pushes back on the idea of the Post Office, noting the original reason the Post Office was used to support national banking arose prior to either the existence of the Federal Reserve or the FDIC. Indeed, Massad’s ultimate conclusion is the suggestion to offer everyone an account at the Federal Reserve – but one with a ceiling and with a limited number of transactions. Massad imagines these FedAccounts would be ‘starter’ accounts as a way to give access to the unbanked an entry into the banking system, and at some point the person would ‘graduate’ to commercial banking.

With this conclusion, Massad carefully threads the needle in his concern for a retail CBDC possibly dis-intermediating commercial banks as well. Massad refers to the Bank of England’s consultation on central bank digital currencies and notes the careful examination that central bank engaged in to ensure it understood the potential consequences of retail CBDC. While he does not mention the ‘Digital Dollar Project’ and his peer, the other Former Chairman of the CFTC Giancarlo, and his work toward a tokenized retail CBDC and its importance for the U.S., Massad believes a retail CBDC may cause as many problems as FedAccounts or the U.S. Post Office. His paper does suggest carefully evaluating and not rushing the Digital Dollar, something Giancarlo has been very clear about during Covid-19. Both also share agreements that were there already a retail CBDC in place in the U.S., the delivery of critical stimulus payments to those who did not have a bank account or direct deposit would not have highlighted what Massad calls the ‘Cash-Digital divide’ in the way Covid-19 did for the U.S.

Massad’s paper overall provides a constructive way of looking at how Libra’s 2.0 construction should be afforded at least the opportunity for Libra to see if they will live up to their promises in helping the unbanked. While Massad discusses capital and other regulatory requirements that Libra may need to meet, the one suggestion to his model that I would add, as I did serve for some time after the FDIC as a contractor on the Making Home Affordable Program – Compliance, is the idea of not only consumer protections, but similar in a manner to the CRA exams for community banks, perhaps assigning a metric such as the number of ‘unbanked’ who achieve access to the payments system in the U.S. as part of Libra’s goals on the compliance side along with necessary capital and reserve requirements, might be the carrot to waive as insurance that David Marcus and Dante Disparte will keep their focus on the unbanked here in America.

The paper is available through the Brookings Institution.

Source link

EDITOR’S CHOICE

‘Shark Tank’ star Kevin O’Leary slams Bitcoin as niche and poorly regulated: ‘a giant nothingburger’ | Currency News | Financial and Business News

Should I buy altcoin? | MyWalletHero

Blockchain takes on forgeries, counterfeits

Business strategies to turn the pandemic around in 2021

Ethereum On Bearish Momentum: 8.5% Down In The Last 6 Hours

Litecoin On Bearish Momentum: 9.16% Down In The Last 6 Hours

Best Pick For You

News

  • Altcoin News
  • Bitcoin News
  • Blockchain News
  • Business News
  • Ethereum News
  • Litecoin News
  • Ripple News

Features

  • Market Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Explained
  • Policy & Regulations
  • Top Cryptocurrencies
  • Technology News

Market Tools

  • Market News
  • Price Indexes
  • Bitcoin Price Index
  • Ethereum Price Index
  • Bitcoin Cash Price Index
  • Litecoin Price Index
  • Monero Price Index
  • HeatmapPartner

Cryptopedia

  • Explained
  • Bitcoin101
  • Bitcoin Cash101
  • Ethereum101
  • ICO101
  • Ripple101

© 2020 Coingraph

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Bitcoin News
    • Ethereum News
    • Ripple News
    • Litecoin News
    • Altcoin News
    • Blockchain News
    • Business News
    • Technology News
    • Policy & Regulations
  • Markets
    • Market News
    • Market Analysis
    • Price Indexes
    • Top Cryptocurrencies
    • Heatmap
  • Opinion
  • Cryptopedia
    • Explained
    • Bitcoin101
    • Ethereum101
    • Bitcoin Cash101
    • ICO101
    • Ripple101
  • Press Releases

© 2020 Coingraph

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 35,463.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,145.48
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.998273
ripple
XRP (XRP) $ 0.276167
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 13.15
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.300883
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 139.78
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 475.13
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 19.46
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.277674
binancecoin
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 40.35
usd-coin
USD Coin (USDC) $ 0.998160
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 35,547.00
bitcoin-cash-sv
Bitcoin SV (BSV) $ 202.11
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 155.08
eos
EOS (EOS) $ 2.70
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.029186
havven
Synthetix Network Token (SNX) $ 13.95
theta-token
Theta Network (THETA) $ 1.99
tezos
Tezos (XTZ) $ 2.61
celsius-degree-token
Celsius Network (CEL) $ 4.94
nem
NEM (XEM) $ 0.210417
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 152.82
cosmos
Cosmos (ATOM) $ 7.60
neo
NEO (NEO) $ 22.92
vechain
VeChain (VET) $ 0.024480
crypto-com-chain
Crypto.com Coin (CRO) $ 0.069324
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 5.78
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 7.02
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 0.999645
maker
Maker (MKR) $ 1,467.94
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 1.34
compound-ether
cETH (CETH) $ 22.98
dash
Dash (DASH) $ 121.60
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.009091
iota
IOTA (MIOTA) $ 0.408417
binance-usd
Binance USD (BUSD) $ 0.995978
zcash
Zcash (ZEC) $ 101.46
cdai
cDAI (CDAI) $ 0.020977
huobi-token
Huobi Token (HT) $ 4.99
filecoin
Filecoin (FIL) $ 21.42
compound-usd-coin
cUSDC (CUSDC) $ 0.021474
yearn-finance
yearn.finance (YFI) $ 30,001.00
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 7.49
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 3.17
sushi
Sushi (SUSHI) $ 6.45
compound-governance-token
Compound (COMP) $ 197.34
ftx-token
FTX Token (FTT) $ 8.89
zilliqa
Zilliqa (ZIL) $ 0.065492
kusama
Kusama (KSM) $ 80.20